'Worst Case
Scenario' in SEC Filing Spooks Investors, Customers
PARIS — Globalstar officials expressed
confidence Feb. 8 that they will be able to squeeze sufficient performance from
their existing constellation of mobile-communications satellites to maintain
business equilibrium until the spacecraft for the second-generation
constellation begin arriving in orbit around late 2009.
Seeking to
calm investors and customers unnerved by the company's Feb. 5 announcement,
which raised the specter of a possible system collapse in 2008, Chief Executive
Jay Monroe and President Anthony J. Navarra said Globalstar's technical
resources and cash position are both strong enough to assure operations until
the new satellites are in orbit.
"The fact
is that on at least two occasions in the past we have faced technical
difficulties with the system and we found fixes for them," Navarra said. "But
these occurred before we were a publicly traded company with an obligation to
make public statements like this immediately."
Milpitas,
Calif.-based Globalstar announced Feb. 5 that its current 40-satellite
constellation, which the company previously had said would provide service
until 2010, is degrading more rapidly than predicted.
Performance
of the solid-state power amplifiers that feed the S-band antennas and permit
two-way communications links is eroding, likely because of the high daily
radiation dose at the constellation's orbital altitude of 1,414 kilometers.
In a
warning that sent Globalstar stock diving by more than 20 percent Feb. 6 and
led some industry observers to begin writing Globalstar's obituary, the
company's statement to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said: "[I]f
the degradation of the S-band antenna amplifiers continues at the current rate,
and if the company is unsuccessful in developing additional technical
solutions, the quality of two-way communications services will decline, and by
some time in 2008 substantially all of the company's currently in-orbit
satellites will cease to be able to support two-way communications services."
In a Feb. 8
interview, Monroe and Navarra addressed three points: what Globalstar and its
contractors knew — and when they knew — about the constellation's health; what
remedial measures might be taken to arrest the performance decline; and whether
the company has access to enough cash to finance its second-generation
constellation over the next two to three years even if subscriber revenues drop
in parallel with satellite performance.
Globalstar
completed an initial stock offering on the U.S. Nasdaq exchange in November and
had listed the S-band amplifier issue as one of many risk factors investors
should consider. But it maintained that the constellation — whose satellites
were designed to last seven and a half years in orbit and were launched between
1998 and 2000 — was healthy enough to operate until the second-generation
satellites were available.
Monroe said Globalstar's assessment at the
time of the stock offering was based on an early 2006 in-depth review of the
constellation's health performed by an outside consultancy.
He said
none of the first-generation contractors, including prime contractor Space
Systems/Loral and payload integrator Alcatel Alenia Space, had been assigned to
follow the health of the satellites. Loral, like Globalstar, had been through
Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the United States
and had long since stopped constellation monitoring, Monroe said.
Similarly,
he said, Alcatel Alenia Space, which since early 2006 had been negotiating a
second-generation manufacturing contract with Globalstar, had not been given
access to data on the first-generation satellites' performance. As a non-U.S.
company, Alcatel Alenia would need technical-assistance agreements approved by
the U.S. State Department before receiving any such information.
Blaise
Jaeger, Alcatel Alenia Space's vice president for telecommunications business,
said Feb. 8 that Alcatel Alenia Space was just as surprised as everyone else by
the most recent assessment of the Globalstar satellites' health.
Similarly, Monroe said Globalstar's contract with
Space Systems/Loral "ended a very long time ago" even though Loral more
recently had been hired to refurbish eight spare first-generation satellites.
These satellites are scheduled for launch aboard two Russian Soyuz rockets in
2007.
Soon after
its successful stock offering, Globalstar signed an $860 million contract with
Alcatel Alenia Space to build 48 second-generation Globalstar satellites, with
the first spacecraft to be ready for launch in the second half of 2009.
Monroe and Navarra
said a fresh system review by outside consultants began in January as part of a
regular annual update Globalstar performs for its financial audit. It is this
review, which is still ongoing, that turned up the extent of the S-band
amplifier problem.
A publicly
traded company in the United
States is under legal
obligation to announce developments of potential material importance. Monroe said this accounts for the Feb. 5
announcement, which he said provides a worst-case analysis of the situation.
"The
language we used is about as conservative an assessment as you can make," Monroe said.
Navarra
said that along with the continuing system review by the outside consultants, Globalstar
is running three parallel investigations in the search for technical fixes to
the power-amplifier problem.
One focuses
on the satellites and how their power levels might be adjusted to minimize the
amplifier-degradation effect. A second review focuses on the system's gateway
Earth stations and how their operation could be modified to compensate for
satellites' diminishing power. The third review is analyzing Globalstar users'
telephone handsets, and whether their functions could be optimized to reduce
the effects of the decline on customers.
Navarra
agreed that, given its age, the Globalstar constellation might be compared to
an automobile whose tires have been worn to a point where little or no tread
remains.
"In that
case you rotate the tires to maximize performance, you increase or decrease
tire pressure depending on driving conditions — there are things you can do," Navarra
said. "We know how to fix these kinds of things. We just need time to do it."
Monroe said Globalstar had begun
discussing with Alcatel whether the second-generation satellites could be
delivered more quickly than originally planned. It is unclear whether the
schedule can be substantially accelerated, however.
"We are
brainstorming with Globalstar now on what the possibilities are," Jaeger said.
"There may be ways of moving more quickly, but we cannot perform miracles."
Monroe said Globalstar still has no launch
contracts signed for the second-generation constellation. Launching 48
satellites, perhaps six or eight at a time, also will be a factor for Globalstar
to contend with as it tries to speed deployment.
Globalstar
has said its second-generation system will cost about $1.2 billion, a figure
that includes the construction, launch and insurance of its satellites, as well
as an upgrade of the gateway Earth stations.
Industry
officials say the total likely will be closer to $1.5 billion.
Whatever
the final number, Globalstar has said it will finance the second-generation
system from operating revenues and from loans and commitments from its
principal shareholder, Thermo Capital Partners.
A
service-availability decline, and even the rumor of one, could affect Globalstar's
subscriber growth and make it more difficult to maintain payments to Alcatel Alenia
Space to keep working on the new satellites.
The Alcatel
Alenia Space contract requires Globalstar to establish an escrow account from
which Alcatel Alenia Space draws in quarterly increments through 2013. The
account was established in late December with the required initial deposit of
40 million euros ($52 million).
Globalstar
said that as of Jan. 1 it had cash and cash commitments from Thermo Capital
Partners totaling $195 million, plus two untapped loans totaling $150 million
and a credit agreement that makes another $150 million available under certain
conditions.
Monroe said that unlike an operator of a
geostationary satellite, Globalstar's capital expenses are "slow and steady. We
have a relatively long capex cycle, and we don't see any new cash issues with Globalstar
for years to come."